<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><rss xmlns:atom='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/' version='2.0'><channel><atom:id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3265359053579662361</atom:id><lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 21:08:21 +0000</lastBuildDate><title>Thinking About Thinking</title><description/><link>http://www.yourthinkingprofile.com/blog/</link><managingEditor>Paul Mico</managingEditor><generator>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>2</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3265359053579662361.post-8845395310922272389</guid><pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 20:47:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2008-02-09T13:08:21.631-08:00</atom:updated><title>Post Two: Research encouraged</title><description>Occasionally I receive a request for assistance from someone interested in using the InQ Inquiry Mode Questionnaire for research. Often the person is a graduate student who wants to do a study leading to a Ph.D. or other doctoral degree, or a consultant interested in gathering data for appealing to a certain client constituency.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Usually their research questions are "occupational-norm" related: Do people who perform a particular role display a thinking profile that is unique to that role? And, if so, do changes in that role affect their subsequent styles of thinking?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;We are delighted to encourage them. We can provide the following assistance: Price discounts on however many instruments they need for their study; a copy of our bibliography; a reprint of the original validity and reliability studies that were done; referring them to research-minded colleagues, where appropriate; and possibly using this Blog to see if there are readers who might want to comment.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;What we would like to have in return is a copy of their research proposal and a copy of their dissertation when it is completed, for our files.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Please feel free to contact me. Thank you.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Paul</description><link>http://www.yourthinkingprofile.com/blog/2008/02/post-two-research-encouraged.html</link><author>Paul Mico</author></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3265359053579662361.post-5885134897610617179</guid><pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 22:45:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2007-12-24T13:50:21.293-08:00</atom:updated><title>First Post</title><description>What I find intriguing about the InQ is its cognitive orientation, in that it assesses one's styles of thinking rather than one's affective orientations, such as attitudes, motivations, and behaviors.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;This from a behavioral scientist who has devoted much of his career to the processes of human endeavor, such as interpersonal relations, training, group discussion-decision, participatory planning, conflict management, organizational performance, and interagency collaboration.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I am very much interested in how people think and how thinking styles affect behaviors. This much is known: there are five basic styles, SYNTHESIST, IDEALIST, PRAGMATIST, ANALYST, and REALIST. The instrument for measuring these -- the Inquiry Mode Questionnaire -- has been tested and proven for reliability and validity, so is ideally suited for research purposes. From time to time, I will review research findings for you.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Thank you for visiting. This is the first of many postings to come.&lt;br/&gt;</description><link>http://www.yourthinkingprofile.com/blog/2007/11/test.html</link><author>Paul Mico</author></item></channel></rss>